Short answer: no, probably not.
Alternate short answer: what are you, fucking stupid?
You can go ahead and throw that question into the same pile as, “Would the Patriots consider keeping Jimmy Garoppolo as their starter beyond Tom Brady’s 4-week suspension if he plays lights out?” and “Should (insert team with extensive QB injuries here) consider signing Tim Tebow/Johnny Manziel?” They’re non-starters. They’re wastes of your time and brain cells. But, they’re flashy and chock full of #HotTakey goodness that people just can’t resist having an opinion about, even if the obvious answers are, “no, probably not,” and “what are you, fucking stupid?”
But, I’ll tell you this, I bet this was on Seahawks’ fans’ minds last Sunday, as we watched Russell Wilson and this offense struggle to a whopping 3 points. I know it crossed my mind a time or two, every time Wilson failed to scramble away from pressure, every time the pocket collapsed around him in an instant, every time the running game was completely shut down because no one was buying Wilson as a threat to tuck the ball and keep it on a zone read.
OK, so maybe it crossed my mind a little more than a time or two.
My stance on injuries has always been: if you’re too hurt to be effective, then it’s time to let someone else have a shot while you get better. I know everyone in that organization – and probably a good percentage of Seahawks fans – respect the hell out of Russell Wilson’s toughness to play through a high ankle sprain that would render bedridden lesser men for at least a month, if not longer. And, I suppose I would agree with them, to a point. But, part of me also REALLY hates the macho bullshit that comes with professional athletes. It’s one thing if you’re Percy Harvin, and every hangnail puts you on the shelf for 8 weeks; Princess Harvin couldn’t be bothered to go out on the field if he felt even the smallest pea underneath his stack of mattresses the night before. But, if you’re obviously too injured to function, and your being out on the field is actively hurting our chances of winning, then I’m going to resent your presence.
The tricky part here is: would the Seahawks have been better with a 100% healthy Boykin, or a 35% healthy Wilson?
On the one hand, the Seahawks scored 3 points; could Boykin have been THAT much worse?
On the other hand, yeah, maybe!
Here’s what we know: with Boykin in there, you’re guaranteed to see a quarterback who can legitimately run with the football. That’s not nothing. That’s probably the biggest (and maybe the ONLY) reason to put him in there over Wilson, particularly when you factor in how good the Rams are along the defensive line. Our O-Line had no shot against them, so it would make sense to have Boykin out there to run around, avoid sacks, maybe rack up some yards on the ground, and generally be a thorn in that defense’s side. With Wilson in there, we were painfully one-dimensional, and not even in a good way, because there were precious few opportunities where we could throw deep or on the run outside of the pocket.
But, with a rookie, undrafted quarterback, you take the good with the bad, and in Boykin’s case, you wonder if the bad outweighs the good. Boykin’s more likely to be turnover prone. Even if you scale the offensive playbook way back and stress the importance of living to fight another day, it’s reasonable to expect Boykin to be fooled by coverages and by Gregg Williams’ exotic blitzes.
The Seahawks might have scored more than 3 points with Boykin, but there’s also a non-zero chance that the Seahawks could’ve been shut out. There’s also a better-than-good chance that the Rams would’ve turned Boykin mistakes into more than the 9 points they ended up with.
Yes, it was an embarrassing defeat that never should’ve happened, but in the end, a Russell Wilson at 35% health still had the ball, with 2 minutes left in the game, and was able to drive us pretty far into Rams territory before Christine Michael fumbled to seal our fate. Had Michael not fumbled, we would’ve had 4th & 2 on the 27 yard line (or thereabouts) with just under a minute to go. You give that 4th down conversion about a 50/50 chance of succeeding, which puts us inside the 25 yard line with 30-40 seconds to go in the game, needing a touchdown to win it. I think, at that point, it’s probably 50/50 that the Seahawks get that touchdown. Making our overall odds of winning the game in this scenario 25%.
So, I’ll ask you, first: if you had Boykin in that same exact scenario (starting a drive with 2 minutes to go, needing a touchdown), what are the odds the Seahawks win the game? I think, given the atmosphere, given his experience level, and given his overall talent level, our odds are considerably worse with Boykin in there.
But, now I’ll ask you this: would the game have been even THAT close had Boykin started the game? Would we have even had a chance to win it at the end? I find it pretty doubtful. Aside from potential turnovers, look at time of possession; with Wilson, we were able to keep it even with the Rams. With Boykin, you wonder how many more 3 & Outs the Seahawks would’ve had. Short drives (both in yards gained, and in time of possession) surely would’ve strained the defense that much more than it already was. Maybe that strain leads to a few more breakdowns, and a few more converted third downs, and maybe a few more points for the bad guys.
And finally, just psychologically speaking, what’s the difference between a 100% healthy Boykin vs. a 35% healthy Wilson? Wilson’s a known quantity, and a Pro Bowl calibre one at that. The Rams have to respect his abilities, and while they knew he had the ankle issue, they also knew he never missed a practice. They had to wonder if Wilson was trying to deke them out. But, either way, they had to respect Wilson’s arm and his accuracy. With Boykin in there, I think they just rear back and attack at will. Moreover, I think their confidence goes through the roof, helping them to play that much better. On the Seahawks’ side, you have to think our guys were pumped to have Wilson in there. With Boykin, you wonder if other guys might have tried to do too much, resulting in more mistakes like we saw with Christine Michael at the end of the game.
I think, when you add it all up, the better call was having Wilson in there, sprained ankle and all. In case there was still any doubt, I just farted out 1,100+ words on the topic to try to put your restless mind at ease.
No, I haven’t been sleeping well since this travesty of a game ended, why do you ask?