Short answer: no.
Slightly longer answer: absolutely not.
Slightly longer answer with profanity: go fuck yourself.
Just so you know where I stand. But, seeing as we’re knee-deep in a Seahawks-less playoffs, we’re weeks and weeks away from Spring Training nonsense, and the college football season is officially in the rearview mirror, it’s an interesting thought exercise to play around with.
We all know the reason why you would NOT trade Russell Wilson: he’s a franchise quarterback, in his prime; he’s a proven winner with one title under his belt and almost a second one; you know if you put proper talent around him, he can take you to where you want to go. He’s young, healthy (aside from that one season), still mobile, has a strong arm, is usually pretty safe with the rock, usually makes good decisions, and is generally lights out in the fourth quarter and overtime. Also, it’s abundantly clear how difficult it is in the NFL to find a franchise quarterback and nuture his talents so that he reaches his full potential, so when you have one still in his prime, you don’t give him away! You pay whatever it takes to keep him around, and deal with the roster fallout accordingly!
This is all simple, basic, NFL 101 stuff here. So, again, would I trade Russell Wilson? Not unless I’m guaranteed to get another franchise quarterback in return.
But, you know, he’s not perfect. There’s always been flaws or weaknesses in his game, and those came to the forefront in 2017, particularly in December when the team completely fell apart. He doesn’t do well with pressure up the middle. With teams frequently gameplanning around keeping him in the pocket, all they have to do is bully our overmatched interior linemen and Wilson just crumbles. Why is that? Well, because he’s not 6’3 and can’t see over these guys! It also takes him WAY too long to get going. If the Seahawks could just jump out to regular 2-score leads and let the defense sit on opposing offenses, we’d be a MUCH better team! All too often, it’s the other way around, and the Seahawks’ offense doesn’t start getting going until the second half, or the 4th quarter in particularly brutal cases. Part of that is Wilson not being as accurate early in games. Part of that is Wilson saving his legs until the team absolutely needs him to tuck the ball and run. There may be other reasons on top of it, but it almost exclusively falls on the quarterback play (with nods to a crappy offensive line, and suspect play-calling). For the Seahawks to succeed, the team needs (a running game) to gameplan early to get Wilson going. The new offensive coordinator needs to bring in quick, easy throws, to get him converting short third downs and keep the chains moving.
Any discussion about trading Russell Wilson has to include what we’d get in return. And, honestly, there aren’t a lot of comparable trades to reference here, because again, teams don’t trade franchise quarterbacks in their prime! You generally see guys either past their prime (Brett Favre to the Jets, Joe Montana to the Chiefs, Drew Bledsoe to the Bills), on their way up (Trent Green to the Chiefs, Brad Johnson to the Redskins, Rob Johnson to the Bills, Jeff George to the Falcons) or with injury concerns (Sam Bradford to the Vikings, Carson Palmer to the Raiders). One interesting comp is the Jeff George deal, where the Colts netted a 1st and 3rd, as well as a 2nd rounder that converted to a 1st rounder based on performance. Carson Palmer’s trade to the Raiders was another interesting case, because he ostensibly WAS in the prime of his career. It wasn’t a great career, but he put up a lot of numbers and was essentially the face of the Bengals’ franchise. The Bengals got a 1st and a 2nd round pick, but their hands were tied. Palmer was threatening retirement if he didn’t get traded, and it doesn’t sound like the market was willing to over-pay for someone whose heart might not be in it.
I guess the closest comp I could find was the Jay Cutler trade from Denver to Chicago. Cutler and a 5th round pick went to the Bears for two 1st rounders, a 3rd rounder, and Kyle Orton. Right here, I think you’re in the ballpark. I think any trade for Wilson has to start with two 1st rounders, and one of them better be in the Top 10. There’s any number of ways you can add on from here. Would you take three 1st rounders? Let’s say the Jets – currently drafting 6th – offered three 1st rounders (this year’s 6th and the next two first rounders), would you take it? I’m not sure I would, but you’d have to think about it, right? For what it’s worth, I don’t know if I’m totally in love with this draft class of NFL quarterbacks, so this thought exercise might be pointless; but maybe you love the top three guys, and you work your magic to move up from 6th to 3 (trading with Indy, who won’t need to draft a QB) and take whoever’s left over.
If it’s me, I think if you’re in the market to trade Wilson, you let it be known (quietly), but that you’re not in a hurry to cut and run. Listen to offers, but be secure at the end of the day with keeping Wilson and having a long and fruitful career with him. In that sense, I think you wait until some team over-pays. One of these Top 10 drafting teams who need a quarterback, I think you squeeze a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in 2018, and another 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in 2019. Something like that. You sign a Josh McCown for a year or two and you use those picks to draft a QB of the future you can mold, as well as fill in the roster around him with extremely talented young players. Get a stud running back, get a stud offensive tackle, get a badass defensive back, get another solid pass rusher.
Also, if it’s me, I’m only dealing with AFC teams. Fortunately, the AFC stinks, and is full of idiot owners and general managers, so this shouldn’t be a problem. Why the Browns aren’t offering the Seahawks the moon and the stars is beyond me. If they offered the Seahawks all their first and second round picks this year (1st overall, 4th overall, and three 2nd rounders – including two at the very top of the 2nd) straight up for Russell Wilson, I think the Seahawks do that in a heartbeat and I think I’d do that too. It’s crazy, of course, because that trade would never happen …
Or would it?
Jim Plunkett is best known as a 2-time Super Bowl champion of the early-80s Oakland/Los Angeles Raiders. However, he was a #1 overall draft pick of the New England Patriots back in 1971. After five pretty mediocre seasons as the Patriots’ starting quarterback, he was traded to the San Francisco 49ers for three 1st rounders, a 2nd rounder, and a player. That was after a season full of injuries and being benched in favor of a rookie! So, it’s not like Plunkett was in Russell Wilson’s league when this deal went down. And yet, the 49ers paid and paid handsomely, because they were a struggling franchise with a moron owner/general manager. And, that’s just it. Bad teams make terrible decisions all the time. Would the Browns over-pay for someone like Russell Wilson, to have him come in and be the savior of the franchise? It wouldn’t shock me one bit.
But, again, as I’ve said repeatedly, unless the deal was crazy insane bonkers in our favor, I’m not trading a franchise quarterback in his prime. There’s a way to turn this thing around without going to such extremes.