The Huskies Took BYU To Town, Prepare To Thrash UCLA

I spent the entire afternoon on Saturday tailgating to my heart’s content.  There was beer, there was beer pong, there was food, there was chatting with friends.  And then, before I knew it, I was whisked away, down the Padelford steps, along the Burke-Gilman Trail, down towards Husky Stadium …

Followed by a sharp right, down into the train tunnel, onto the train, and out at the Safeco Field stop.  See, this would be my final Mariners game of the season, and it’s the annual Oktoberfest celebration.  You buy a seat in a certain section, and you get a giant glass beer stein, a free beer, and the enjoyment of watching the Mariners beating up on the Rangers in a meaningless game in a meaningless season of our meaningless lives.  I want to say I browned out through 78% of it, and I definitely got lost on my way back to the seats after wolfing down an order of wings and a hot dog (I think).  The rest of the time, I want to say I was my usual charming, sophisticated self.  My night ended on my friend’s couch.

In my inebriated state, I do seem to recall someone telling me the Huskies were up 35 to 0, so I had that to look forward to on Sunday morning.  I DVR’d the game so I could watch it before the NFL kicked off, and boy was it a good one!

The running game was great (Ahmed had 86 on 10 carries with 2 TDs; Gaskin had 81 on 14 carries with 1 TD).  Jake Browning was damn near flawless (23/25, 277 yards, 1 TD, 0 INTs, and an incredible 9-yard TD run just before halftime).  Aaron Fuller led the way on the receiving side of things, with 8 catches for 107 yards.

After a punt on the first drive of the game, the Huskies scored on 5 of their next 6 drives (and, really, it should’ve been 7 of their next 7, except for 2 missed close-range field goals of 40 and 24 yards).  For all the hype of BYU’s stout defense (I mean, they DID go into Wisconsin and come away victorious), the Huskies were able to do whatever the fuck they wanted.

And yet, somehow the Husky defense STILL out-played the offense!  BYU had 7 first downs all game.  They had 194 total yards!  Only 34 on the ground!  They did biff a 45-yard field goal in the first half, but still, we would’ve shut them out entirely if it weren’t for a Chico McClatcher muffed punt late in the 4th quarter.  That was a legitimate Top 20 football team, and we DECIMATED THEM!

As a reward, the Huskies are back in the Top 10 in both polls.  That was, without question, our most impressive win of the season, and it came at a time where we really needed it.  Stanford did us no favors by losing to Notre Dame over the weekend.  Utah did us no favors by losing to the Cougs (making our 14-point road victory that much less impressive).  We were always the great hope of the Pac-12, and that’s only been further reinforced by what’s happened over the weekend.

This Saturday, we go to UCLA, who is currently winless and has looked pretty pathetic doing it.  I couldn’t be less worried about this one – even if it is on the road – but my focus is squarely on Oregon in two weeks.  They get to spend all this time working on JUST beating the Huskies, since the Pac-12 – in all of its wisdom – gave them a BYE week this week (while we get to go on the road in back-to-back games, because that’s fair for some reason).  I’m already quaking with rage for when we go to Eugene and …

I don’t even want to think about it.

Just hope that the Huskies aren’t peaking too early.  It’s hard to improve upon a game like that against BYU, but we might be going up against the very worst team in the conference this Saturday, so who knows?  The onslaught starts NEXT week.  Oregon is currently in the Top 20, Colorado is undefeated and in the Top 25, Cal was just in the Top 25 before losing to the aforementioned Ducks, and Stanford is in the Top 20 after losing to the aforementioned Fighting Irish.  Then, there’s a creampuff in the Beavers before going on the road for the Apple Cup, at which time you have to hope the Cougars will be ranked (they’re currently 4-1 and looking MUCH better than anyone had any right to expect them to be).

I’m telling you, if we pull it off, there’s no WAY this schedule can be held against us when it comes to the playoffs!

Looking Ahead To The Washington Huskies’ 2017 Football Schedule

The 2014 Huskies were largely a Sark-based team in Coach Pete’s first season; we enjoyed a Sark-esque record when all was said and done.  The 2015 Huskies were a real transition team, as more of Coach Pete’s players got on the field and the team as a whole became further acclimated to his way of doing things.  In a lot of ways, 2015 looked like a bit of a step back, but it was entirely necessary to get the program to where it was in 2016, which was a huge step forward.

I can’t say enough good things about the 2016 Huskies, it was the most fun I’ve had following this team since 2000, and was almost certainly the best Husky team I’ve ever seen (keeping in mind that I was never a fan of the university during the Don James glory years).  The 2016 Huskies were truly one of the best four football teams of the year and were rewarded as such with an invite to the College Football Playoff.  Sadly, we were turned away by the buzzsaw that was the Alabama Crimson Tide, which only goes to reinforce the fact that we need to build up this program to become that type of buzzsaw.

So, what do we have to look forward to in 2017?  Will the Huskies become that buzzsaw?  Probably a little early in the process to say yes, but I think more than anything you just want to see them continue to take steps forward.

You can look at what we lost and have sort of a Glass Half Empty outlook.  John Ross was drafted 9th overall.  Sure, we’ve still got Dante Pettis, who looks ready to ascend to the #1 receiver spot on this team, but he’s no John Ross.  That’s no knock against him, necessarily, because NOBODY is John Ross.  That kind of speed is once in a generation.  When you tack on Ross’ route running, versatility, and ability to make a catch in traffic, he was really the total package and may be the best receiver we’ve ever had in the program.  So, you can look at the wide receiver position and say, “Yeah, there’s a decline there compared to last year.”

Then, obviously, you’ve got Kevin King, Budda Baker, and Sidney Jones all snapped up before the end of the second round.  Our two starting cornerbacks and our starting safety, gone.  I know the Huskies recruited the secondary pretty well, with lots of highly-rated guys set to step into starting roles, but we just won’t know how good those players are until we see them in game action.

Go on and on down the list of guys we graduated.  Just a ton of talent walking out the door.  In many ways, 2017 will be yet another transitional season.  But, obviously different from how 2015 was a transitional year.  This isn’t going from one head coach to another; this is essentially an evaluation of Coach Pete’s ability to constantly refurbish the depth of this team on the fly.  Guys are going to graduate, guys are going to leave for the NFL after their Junior years; the mark of a truly great head coach is how he’s able to recruit guys who can jump in there and replace those former starters.  I’m talking about recruiting Freshmen who are good enough to play right away, as well as guys who grow into starting-calibre players within a year or two at the most.  It’s about always having the next wave of superstars champing at the bit.  It’s about allowing the linemen and other undersized guys to grow and mature in the program so eventually they can be impact players.  And so on and so forth.

Coach Sark and his team of recruiters were able to land some real whales for this school, but I don’t know if they were on the same level as Coach Pete and Co.  Sark seemed to be more interested in recruiting the glamour positions; Coach Pete seems to be more interested in building up all positions, eliminating as many weaknesses as possible.

In that respect, yes, the 2017 Huskies might have fewer studs than they did in 2016, but it’s entirely possible that the overall quality of the team is improved, from 1 to 90, or however many players you’re allowed to have in college.

All of this comes with the caveat that injury luck is always the most important factor with any sports team.

The offensive line should be a real strength for the Huskies, more than any other year I can remember.  The Huskies return the most experienced line in the conference, which should help our stud running backs – Coleman and Gaskin, among many of the younger guys looking to make names for themselves – as well as, obviously, our quarterback.

If there’s a questionmark, it’s Jake Browning.  Is he healthy?  Will he BE healthy when the season starts?  I’ll never question his ability to study and work on his craft, but given his relative lack of size, can he STAY healthy for the long haul?  He’s obviously a tough kid, playing on a shoulder that required surgery, but I don’t know if he’ll grow into a Heisman contender if he can’t stay on the field and at close to 100%.

If Browning isn’t healthy, how good are the guys behind him?  The Huskies have recruited some pretty highly-rated quarterbacks recently, but are they too raw to step in this early into their careers?  Will our season be totally derailed if Browning is limited?

Wide receiver is the position I’m most excited about.  Obviously, I love Pettis and Chico McClatcher.  But, I’ve also been hearing rumblings about some of these receivers who haven’t had a lot of playing time thus far.  Recent recruits ready to make their marks.  Should be interesting; hope they’ll get a lot of time to work with Browning on their timing and whatnot.

Along the D-Line, in spite of the loss of Elijah Qualls, there is still a significant amount of returning talent.  Indeed, this unit should prove to be the strongest of the entire defense, and will likely have to get home with even more regularity than they did in 2016 (which they did at a pretty high clip) to help compensate for potential challenges in the back end.

Taylor Rapp, at safety, figures to be a force, and maybe the defensive MVP in 2017.  We’ll need him to make that next step to superstar status if we want to maintain our defensive dominance in the Pac-12.  He looked every bit as good as anyone I’ve seen towards the end of last season, so I’m pretty confident he’ll get the job done.

Bottom line is, the 2017 Huskies will be very good.  Where they end up will largely depend on the schedule they play.

Last year, the Huskies were continuously killed for their weak schedule.  It was the primary reason why people felt they had legitimate arguments against them making the College Football Playoff.  I never bought into that, and if you’re like me – and wanted to throw your remote through the television every time some national pundit knocked the Huskies for this – GET READY FOR MORE OF THE SAME.  Because, holy Jesus, does the 2017 schedule look like the creamiest cream puff wrapped in a cloud of cotton candy.

For the second year in a row, we kick off our season against Rutgers.  It was a Home & Home series that was scheduled way back when Rutgers had a good football team, and you can’t very well just chop them off the schedule without facing a huge penalty.  So, here we are.  This time, on the road, which I suppose makes the game marginally more difficult, but my guess is Rutgers is once again going to be one of the worst teams in the Big 10.

The Huskies round out their non-conference schedule with home games against Montana (an FBS school) and Fresno State (who had all of 1 win in 2016).  The Huskies could sit Browning for all three of those games and still easily walk away 3-0.

Every year, every Pac-12 school plays 9 conference games.  I don’t know if this still sets us apart or not (I believe the SEC only plays 8 conference games, but they might be moving up to 9 or at least talking about it), but I think it’s a great argument when it comes to comparing our schools to those conferences who play 8 or less.  I mean, let’s face it, every conference has their duds.  And you can talk about Washington’s weak non-conference schedule all you want, but every power school schedules their share of powderpuffs.  Regardless of how good or bad your in-conference opponent is, it’s still an in-conference opponent, and those games are more difficult and ultimately mean more.

Anyway, this year, the Huskies catch 5 home conference games and 4 road conference games (it alternates every year).  Their conference schedule kicks off with 2 road games, though – at Colorado and at Oregon State – which means we get 5 of our final 7 games at home.  Colorado should be a lot worse than they were last year, as the 2016 Buffaloes were very senior-heavy, and I highly doubt they recruit nearly as well as we do, so I can’t imagine the guys they’ve got coming up through the ranks are going to be as good as the guys they had last year.  Oregon State is still in rebuilding mode (as they are seemingly every year), so I can’t imagine it’ll take much of an effort to get to 5-0 with this schedule.

Then, there’s a home game against Cal, who is working in a new head coach and ostensibly a new offensive system, so I can’t imagine that’s going to be a very close game.  We follow that up with a road game against ASU, who I’m pretty sure we haven’t beaten on their home turf in over a decade.  They were pretty sorry last year, and figure to be better this year; this could be a sneaky-tough game for the Huskies (who will have played 3 of 4 on the road when they’re finished with this one).  I could see the Huskies winning this one in ugly fashion to get to 7-0.

That leads us to the real heart of the 2017 schedule.  This year, we avoid USC and Arizona.  By all accounts, USC is poised to be the top ranked Pac-12 team, at least going into the season.  They might have the next #1 overall draft pick at the quarterback position in Sam Darnold, which is moderately terrifying.  Obviously, that means even our conference schedule sees a huge downgrade in the eyes of the national pundits, by virtue of not playing the so-called best team in the Pac-12.  And, say what you want about Arizona, but they’ve notoriously been a tricky team for us to play most years, and they return one of the more experienced offensive lines to boot.  I wouldn’t be shocked to see them as a “surprise” team in the conference.

Getting back to the heart of the schedule, we follow up all those road games (and a BYE week tacked onto the end of it) with back-to-back home contests against UCLA and Oregon.  UCLA is up there with Utah among the second tier teams in the Pac-12 South.  They strike me as very much of an unknown, as they seem to recruit well every year, but ultimately produce poor results on the field.  I’m sure they’ll give the Huskies everything they can, and I’d be seriously disappointed if we lost this one.  Ditto Oregon, although they’re in something of a rebuild mode as well (albeit, starting with a much stronger base than OSU).  I just think Washington has more talent than Oregon, period.  As such, I see no reason why we won’t be 9-0 heading into what will likely be the most important game of the regular season.

At Stanford, Friday, November 10th, at 7:30pm on Fox Sports 1.  The Cardinal fell from their perch as one of the top teams in the conference last year, and they obviously lost a lot of talent to graduation/the NFL Draft, so they’ll be breaking in a lot of key positions heading into 2017.  They have a real bugger of a schedule through their own first 9 games of the season, with road games against USC, Utah, and Washington State, as well as home games against UCLA and Oregon.  So, when I call this game on November 10th the “most important”, I really mean it’s the most important to the Washington Huskies, as it’s the one true landmine in an otherwise reasonable slate of football games.

I fully anticipate Stanford to have anywhere from 1-3 losses by the time they host the Huskies, but this is also a well-coached football team, who recruits like gangbusters.  What does that mean?  Well, even if they’re not competing for a Rose Bowl berth (which, for the record, I’m not necessarily taking off the table, as it’s entirely possible they are up there fighting for the Pac-12 North yet again), this is still a team that notoriously gets better as the season goes along.  When you play Stanford, I think you’d much rather face them early in the season.  Facing them in mid-November is sort of my worst nightmare, particularly with a schedule like this, where there doesn’t appear to be many tough games leading into this one.  On paper, I think the Huskies are better than the Cardinal, but with this game being on the road, against a quality team, anything can happen.  Let’s face it, I never would’ve thought the Huskies could’ve lost at home to USC last year, and look at what happened.

There’s a very reasonable chance that the game against Stanford is our last chance to make a big positive impression on the College Football Playoff Committee.  Hell, it might be our ONLY chance, but that’s neither here nor there.  After that, we wrap up the season with home games against Utah and Washington State.  I think everyone is really sleeping on these two teams.  Utah is always tough and really makes you earn every win against them.  They could easily upset a team like USC and find themselves in the thick of things by the time they come to Seattle.  And, as for the Cougs, they’ve definitely been written off after last year, losing two bullshit games early in the season, followed by their final three games (including the Holiday Bowl).  While I agree that the Huskies very much SHOULD beat the Cougars, it’s still the Apple Cup, and weird things can always crop up.  The Cougs obviously have Falk back, and if he can stay healthy, he’ll always give them a chance to win.  And, their defense has always been underrated while over-producing under Mike Leach.  So, you know, while these last two games aren’t necessarily as flashy as the road game against Stanford, we could still be talking about a couple of ranked teams when all is said and done.

The bottom line is, this is a 12-game schedule in which the Huskies could very easily run the table.  There will obviously be challenges along the way, but I’ll just say that it wouldn’t necessarily be a shock to the system like it was last year.  Odds are, the Huskies will likely lose 1 game.  I’d say the odds are equal that they’d lose 2 games as they are to the Huskies winning them all, if that makes any sense.  1 loss SHOULD mean that the Huskies play in the Pac-12 Championship Game.  And, assuming the Huskies face the Trojans in that game, we’re looking at a game that would not only get us into the Rose Bowl, but would get us back to the College Football Playoff.

I’ll say this, just to get it out of the way:  any combination of scenarios where the Huskies finish with 1 loss, and that 1 loss is in the Pac-12 Championship Game, the Huskies absolutely will not make the College Football Playoff – even if the Pac-12 South champion has more losses, and ultimately gets passed over as well.  I’m a firm believer that the only way the Huskies are able to compensate for that schedule is if they beat an awesome team in the conference title game, a la last year.  And even then, who knows?

A lot of this depends on what happens in the other conferences.  What happens if there are two 1-loss teams in the SEC?  Or an undefeated team and a 1-loss Alabama team?  On top of whatever the Big 10 throws in there, Clemson, and the Oklahoma schools.

One thing the Huskies really have going for them is that they should start the season highly ranked.  Top 10 or Top 15 at the worst.  Now, imagine that team running the table through the regular season, then beating USC in the conference championship game!  We might get to pick where we play in the College Football Playoff!

All of that is a long way off, of course.  But, it’s still fun to think about as this baseball season drags on.  I very much need football back in my life.

Huskies Dominate In Apple Cup, Win Pac-12 North

I’m going to save my insanity about the College Football Playoffs until after they announce the updated rankings.  In the meantime, let’s just enjoy this, huh?  The Huskies are BACK, baby!

What an incredible feeling.  I know it’s not over yet, and we’ve got one more major hurdle before we win the conference title, but for all intents and purposes we’re at least co-champions in the regular season, which is a far cry from where we were just 8 years ago.

That 2008 season, where the Huskies went 0-9 in conference (including losing the worst Apple Cup I’ve ever seen in my life) and 0-12 overall, was a big part of the reason for this blog even existing.  Then, we brought Sark in, he got us going on the right track, and we built upon that tenfold with Coach Pete.  It’s been quite the journey, but now here we are, hopefully around for an extended run of greatness.

Of course, if we lose to Colorado on Friday, we’ll probably get saddled with an inferior opponent in the Alamo Bowl, leaving nothing but regret in our wake, so let’s try real hard to win this conference championship!

The Cuogs, last Friday, posed no challenge.  We jumped out to a 28-3 lead after one quarter, and from that point, it was just one long game of keep-away en route to a 45-17 victory.  Browning got back on track, completing 21/29 for 292 yards and 3 TDs (vs. 0 picks).  Lavon Coleman was the rushing star, even though he only ran for 82 yards on 10 carries, he was able to plunge a couple across the goalline.  Gaskin had 50 yards and a TD of his own.  Dante Pettis caught 3 balls for 86 yards and 2 TDs, and John Ross chipped in 8 catches for 80 yards, a TD, and 37 yards rushing on 2 carries.  Don’t forget Chico McClatcher’s 6 catches for 80 yards.  And, big ups to Pettis for completing another pass for 50 yards on a trick play (the fact that we went to that well a second time, and it didn’t work, sure drew the ire of the announcers for some reason; as if there can be TOO MANY trick plays in a football game!).

On the flipside, we held Luke Falk to 269 yards and 1 TD against 3 INTs.  As a team, they ran for 65 yards.  Budda Baker had another outstanding game (including 2 tackles for loss and a pick); D.J. Beavers had a monster game in his own right with a pick of his own, as well as a fumble recovery.  We weren’t able to get a ton of pressure – only 2 sacks on the day – but we were sound in every other aspect of the game.  When you’re up 25 after one quarter, it’s not like you need to send blitzes every other down.

As noted above, we play Colorado this Friday in Santa Clara for the Pac-12 Championship.  The Buffaloes also went 8-1 in conference, with their only loss coming to USC during their resurgence, so consider both of us pretty lucky we don’t have to face the Trojans again this year.  Colorado’s other loss came in their non-conference schedule, when they went to Michigan and got pounded.  The Buffaloes run and pass the ball pretty well, but they might actually be better on defense than they are on offense.

This will be a game of the two best secondaries in the conference, and among the two best secondaries in all of college football.  Overall, though, I don’t think we’re talking about a defense that’s anywhere near as good as what USC is packing, so it would be a bit of a surprise if we weren’t able to move the ball on them.  The question here is:  will the big play be available to us?  I’d like to go back and see how many of our scoring drives featured a play of at least 35 yards, because I have a feeling the percentage is pretty high compared to the national average.  Fortunately, Browning is one of the more accurate passers, so if we have to play the dink & dunk game, we can do that.  He did just pull himself out of a 2-week funk though, so let’s hope he comes out on fire like he did against Wazzu.

Of course, I don’t have to tell you what’s on the line if we win this game.  Rose Bowl at the VERY worst.  You might not be able to tell just from reading this post, but I’m trying to pump myself up and not be disappointed if the Huskies are iced out of the College Football Playoffs.  The Rose Bowl is a helluva consolation prize!  And, if I can swing it, I plan on going there to see it all in person.

But, that doesn’t mean we can’t hope for more.  Let’s go Dawgs.  One more win and then let the chips fall where they may.

The Huskies Didn’t Overlook ASU

I guess my concern going into this game was the same as everybody else’s:  how would the Huskies respond after getting punched in the mouth against USC?  While the defense was on point throughout – keeping ASU in the double-digits in yards through three quarters – I’d say I was pretty worried about Jake Browning for most of the first half.  His throws were high and wide, he seemed tentative, leading to balls being thrown late.  He had an abysmal completion percentage and his first TD was a swing pass that Chico McClatcher took 75 yards to the house!

Eventually, Browning settled down, completed a bunch of passes in a row, and ended up with a completion percentage north of 60, with another (proper) TD for good measure.  I’m not sure what THAT was all about, but it was pretty reasonable to keep him in there for most of the game, to ensure that the offense got on track.  He’ll need to be MUCH better, much earlier in the game, on Friday if we want to go to the Pac-12 Championship Game.

Thanks to our amazing defense, we ran out to a 24-0 lead at halftime, and a 30-3 lead after three quarters before they started moving the ball in garbage time.  Still, a 44-18 win is a 44-18 win.

Aside from Chico, let’s give kudos to John Ross for doing his best impression of a possession receiver.  No big plays for Ross in this one, but he caught 12 balls for 95 yards and helped us move the sticks on many occasions.  Dante Pettis had another big game:  7 catches for 105 and a TD, but he did drop a ball that ended up getting intercepted.  Gotta play a clean game against the Cougs this week.

Myles Gaskin got on track, running for 127 yards on 16 carries, with a TD.  Lavon Coleman also chipped in a TD and 47 yards.  And, for as bad as he looked early, Browning finished with his second-highest passing yardage game of the season with 338.

Defensively, DID YOU SEE THAT INTERCEPTION BY KEVIN KING???  That was the greatest thing I’ve ever seen.

With some injuries to some key players, the Huskies were forced to bring the blitz more to get pressure on the quarterback.  Highlighted by Budda Baker’s 1.5 sacks, the team racked up 6 in total to make it a long day for their quarterback.  They had no better luck running the ball, as their two feature backs ran for a combined 34 yards on 14 attempts.

The Huskies are 10-1 going into the Apple Cup.  The last time the Huskies won 10 or more games was in the year 2000.  This is only the second time the Huskies have double-digit wins since their championship season in 1991.  Coming into this season, if you would’ve told me the Huskies would be guaranteed to have 10 wins, I would’ve taken that on the spot.  But, if we closed out this season with 10 wins now, it would probably go down as the most disappointing season in history.

Time to finish, Huskies.  Don’t stop now.

The Huskies TC of B Against The Vandals

Just another thrashing by the University of Washington, 59-14.  It’s not even worth much of a recap; we were up 7-0 after one quarter, broke it open to make it 35-0 at halftime, and after a quick Browning TD to Ross to start the second half, the starters were pulled and the backups played like backups.

Jake Browning tied a school record with 5 touchdowns in this game (seems like a record he’s destined to break just as soon as we play a team capable of hanging with us in the first half of a game).  Two to Pettis, two more to Ross, and a nifty little tunnel screen broken by Chico McClatcher for 30 yards.  All in all, a very efficient day for Browning, who’s already got 8 touchdowns on the season (half of his total from last year) and is completing 75% of his passes after two games.  He’s in charge, he’s calm under pressure, and he’s going to have to be on a lot of pre-season Heisman lists for 2017 if he keeps it up.  Hell, if he can do this against real football teams, he might even enter the conversation THIS year!

The running game, again, didn’t really bust out like you’d expect, though Gaskin had a better day than last week.  He only ran for 67 yards, but had a 5.6 average per carry, and he broke into the endzone for the first time this year.  It might be a concern for some, but I look at it this way:  we know this team can run the ball – it’s got the same offensive line as last year – and we know Gaskin is a stud.  His numbers will come in time.  What we didn’t know coming into this season is how much Browning and the passing game overall would improve.  I’d MUCH rather see this team throw the ball around the field, get into a nice little groove with Ross coming back, and a couple of our seniors from last year gone, than pound the ball for the sake of pounding the ball.

Besides, let’s face it, our non-conference schedule is doing us no favors.  If we want to continue to be highly ranked – and pull this conference up from the muck (with teams like Wazzu, Cal, and the Arizona schools stinking up the joint) – we need to put up high-scoring, impressive wins against these duds.  You’re not going to do that by force-feeding a running game; you’re going to do it by spreading everyone out and getting that passing game going.

Believe me, when Browning has the reputation of a gunslinger that he’s just starting to instill, teams will refrain from loading the box so much and we’ll be able to get our yards on the ground.

On the defensive side of the ball, I haven’t seen a unit this stifling since the 2013 Seahawks.  I’m serious, we might have 8 or 9 guys on that side of the ball playing on Sundays when it’s all said and done.  For a college defense to be this good – outside of the SEC – is unheard of.  We’re going to take the Pac-12 by storm!  I’ve seen a little bit of these other schools, and there’s nothing impressive about the lot of ’em!

I mean, the way we’ve played through these first two weeks, on the defensive side of the ball particularly, reminds me of all those times teams like Stanford, Oregon, Stanford, LSU, Stanford, USC, and Stanford that have just dominated us over recent years.  At best, they’d still be toying with us, only to put the clamp down.  That’s going to be us this year!  Finally, we get to be the aggressors!  I cannot fucking wait for September 30th.

Huskies Dominated Scarlet Knights In Season Opener

This game was a runaway freight train pretty much from the very beginning and didn’t let up until the game was well in hand.  Featuring a new-look deep passing attack, Jake Browning was able to throw touchdowns of 43, 38, and 50 yards to Chico McClatcher and John Ross in the first quarter to initiate the route.  It was 24-0 after one, 34-3 at half, and 48-3 heading into the final quarter before Rutgers tacked on 10 more points to close it out.

John Ross had 3 touchdowns on the day (two of those mentioned above in the first quarter, and a 92-yard kickoff return in the second quarter).  Dante Pettis added a 68-yard punt return to solidify our dominance in all phases of this game.

Granted, Rutgers is ranked something crazy like 111th, but if the Huskies play the way they played – at least in the first half – they can compete with anybody.

Browning threw for 287 yards – most of that in the first half – on 10.6 yards per attempt.  He wasn’t perfect, but he completed 2/3 of his passes and showed a lot of poise.

The offensive line looked GREAT!  At least in pass protection.  The one fault of the offense is that they were never able to get the run game going (Gaskin was held to 57 yards on 15 carries).  My thinking is that Rutgers sold out for the run – to the detriment of all the one-on-ones they were giving up down field – but even so, we’ve been in that position before and been able to rush better than that.  Definitely something to work on, but at least we weren’t a wet paper bag on the passing downs.

I also thought the defensive line was tremendous, I thought we were able to get pressure from a number of different areas, and I thought our secondary was as good as advertised.  All in all, looks like a really dominating defense.

Hard to know much about the Huskies’ make-up in a game like this.  Are the Huskies as good as their 14th ranking (surely to go up this week, thanks to some teams ahead of them falling)?  Well, they did what they were supposed to do, and that’s dominate a lesser opponent from the jump.  They’ll need to do more of the same the next two weeks to keep in everyone’s good graces, as far as rankings are concerned.  I still think this team could be awfully special.